 |
| Once
you have learnt the basics of wine tasting, found on the main page,
in this section you can test yourself and learn to distinguish the
characteristics of different types of wine. You only have to get hold
of the bottles of wine we mention below (we try to recommend wines
that economically accessible) and sit in front of your PC with the
appropriate glass of wine. |
| HOW
TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN A YOUNG WINE AND A WINE AGED IN THE BARREL
AND THEN IN THE BOTTLE. For this test we use
the following wines: |
|
|
|
Young:
Luberri 2004 carbonic maceration Approx price.
Shop: 5.40 € |
| . |
|
|
|
|
Aged:
Luis Cañas crianza 2002
Approx price. Shop: 6.80 € |
| |
|
|
|
| SIGHT
Holding the two wine glasses at the same height, tilt both through
45º against a white, matt background in order to appreciate different
shades of colour. |
| |
| With
the Luberri 2004 wine, we see greater intensity
of colour, being a younger wine. This is a deep cherry red with
violetish edges. Luis Cañas crianza
2002, on the other hand, will have less intense cherry hues
with garnet-coloured edges. |
|
|
| SMELL |
| |
|
In
the olphatory phase, on bringing the wines to the nose, we can see
that both are clean, without any odd smell, but different one from
the other.
With the Luberri, greater colour intensity is observed on swirling
the wine in the glass, as well as a greater aromatic intensity (the
aroma is stronger); on the other hand, while the aromatic strength
of the Luis Cañas is less, it has a greater complexity of
smells (different groups of aromas can be detected).
The Luberri has many primary aromas – provided
by the grape. Bringing the glass to the nose, we close our eyes
and concentrate and we can smell wild red berries (raspberry, redcurrant...),
much freshness and a touch of a lactic component; this is why one
could be reminded of fruits of the wood yoghourt. In the end, a
touch of something herbal or grassy may also be observed.
With the Luis Cañas, the two types of aromas
are quite different. The first impression gives us aromas provided
by the barrel. The fruit is there but, while fruits of the wood
were observed with the previous wine, here we appreciate more mature
and sweeter red fruits; in other words, of redcurrant or blackcurrant
jam. The wood is represented by hints of vanilla, burnt, cedar (cigar
box) and toasted (as when we are near coffee machines toasting coffee
beans). |
|
| MOUTH |
|
|
|
Bringing the
Luberri to the mouth, the entrance is dry (it
does not contain sugars), observing a slight tickle at the tip
of the tongue, arising from the effervescence from the carbonic
production method. This carbon dioxide produced as a result of
the fermentation, is normal in young, recently bottled wines.
Once swirled and oxygenated and moved around the mouth, we should
perceive that the wine does not leave many taste sensations (on
closing your eyes and sticking out your tongue, you will hardy
notice taste sensations on your taste buds). But you will observe
a slight astringency (dryness) at the centre of the tongue and
on the gums. The main characteristic of this wine in the mouth
will be its lengthy retronasal phase, i.e. the great number of
aromas left in the mouth by this type of wine. The aftertaste
in the mouth is not very long, once the wine is swallowed, it
does not last long.
With Luis
Cañas, on swirling it around the mouth, we will
perceive that it is denser and heavier than the previous (due
to the fact that it has more body). Dry entrance: on closing your
eyes and sticking out your tongue, you will observe a slight acidity
at the sides of the tongue; this is a sign that it has certain
acidity. We can subsequently appreciate a bitter sensation at
the back of the tongue. We will perceive a dry sensation of the
upper gums (something harsh about it), but different from the
young wine. With the young wine we perceive a somewhat grassy
astringency, while with this one we observe the tanicity that
the barrel has given it; a less grassy and possibly - for some
– a more pleasant harshness. In my view, both sensations
are pleasant but just somewhat different. The aftertaste of a
glass of Luis Cañas is long lasting and agreeable given
the full-bodied taste in the mouth and its slight tanicity, which
hangs on the gums.
|
|
| RESUME |
we have
here two wines that re more than acceptable price-quality wise. The young
wine maintains a great nose due to the aromas provided by the grape. Although
it feels light on the palate, compared with a more mature wine, this is
not the case when comparing it to other young wines. The second wine is
stronger on the palate and stays longer, given its aromatic complexity and
the fact that it has more body.
See you next month! |